Paper Summaries
Assisted death for prisoners and forensic patients: complexity and controversy illustrated by four recent cases
What’s the issue: The complexities of allowing prisoners and people in mental health facilities to choose Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) are discussed in this paper. Four recent cases are described which illustrate the challenges and ethical dilemmas involved.
Why it matters: Deciding whether prisoners should access MAiD based on mental illness as the sole criterion raises questions about balancing the right to self-determination against the state's duty to protect vulnerable individuals. Allowing those who have committed serious crimes to choose death also potentially impacts on victims' rights and societal perceptions of justice and care.
What’s next: While individuals should have the right to equivalence of health care, jurisdictions that are considering laws permitting MAiD for non-terminal disorders should consider where the balance between personal autonomy and paternalism should lie.